Net Metering by State (2026 Guide)
With the 30% federal residential solar tax credit gone (it expired December 31, 2025), the single biggest factor in whether solar pays off is now how your utility credits the electricity your panels send back to the grid — your state's net metering policy.
The differences are enormous. In some states your utility credits you the full retail rate for every kilowatt-hour you export. In others, you get a few cents on the dollar — or nothing at all. This guide covers every state, current as of July 2026.
Key Takeaways
- About 20 states still offer full retail net metering (1:1 credit) for new residential customers — including Florida, New Jersey, Maryland, Colorado, Virginia, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming.
- Major states have moved to net billing with reduced export credits: California (NEM 3.0), Arizona, North Carolina, Illinois (new in 2025), Michigan, and Idaho (a 31% cut in September 2025).
- A handful of states have no mandated compensation at all: South Dakota, Tennessee (TVA territory), and Alabama (avoided cost plus a monthly solar fee).
- Rules are changing fast — Pennsylvania, Ohio, Iowa, and Washington all have reductions pending or deadlines approaching. Where policy is tightening, locking in now usually grandfathers you at today's better rate for 10–25 years.
How to Read This Table
- Full retail (1:1): every exported kWh offsets one imported kWh at the full price you pay. Best case.
- Near retail: credit slightly below retail (typically 75–90%).
- Net billing / export rate: exports credited at a set rate well below retail, often based on "avoided cost" (what the utility would pay for wholesale power).
- Avoided cost only / none: exports earn wholesale rates (~2–4¢/kWh) or nothing. Solar still works here, but only if you use most of your power yourself (often with a battery).
Net Metering Rules in All 50 States (2026)
| State | Policy type (new customers, 2026) | What exports earn | Notable 2025–26 status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | No net metering | Avoided cost (~3–4¢) minus a monthly solar fee | Court upheld Alabama Power's solar fee (Mar 2026) |
| Alaska | Net metering, avoided-cost exports | Retail netting; net exports at avoided cost | SB 150 (retail-rate mandate) in committee, not law |
| Arizona | Net billing (RCP export rate) | ~3–5¢/kWh, locked 10 yrs, declines annually for new sign-ups | Rates step down each year; batteries drive economics |
| Arkansas | Net billing (Act 278) | Avoided-cost-based, roughly 20–40% of retail | Pre-Oct 2024 systems grandfathered at 1:1 until 2040 |
| California | NEM 3.0 (Net Billing Tariff) | Hourly export rates, avg ~5–8¢ vs 25–40¢ retail | Appeals court upheld NEM 3.0 (Mar 2026) |
| Colorado | Full retail net metering | 1:1 retail; annual excess at avoided cost | Stable; rising Xcel rates increase solar value |
| Connecticut | RRES successor tariff | Near retail (netting option); new 2026 adjustment trims credit ~15% | New Solar Energy Adjustment for 2026 interconnections |
| Delaware | Full retail net metering | 1:1 retail with annual true-up | Cost-benefit study ordered; no change enacted |
| Florida | Full retail net metering | 1:1 retail; annual excess at avoided cost | Intact — 2022 repeal was vetoed |
| Georgia | Utility buyback (no netting mandate) | ~7¢/kWh (Georgia Power, instantaneous netting) | 1:1 monthly-netting pilot full and closed |
| Hawaii | Smart DER export schedule | TOU export rates by island (~7–41¢ depending on island/time) | Replaced Smart Export/CGS+ Oct 2024; 7-yr rate lock |
| Idaho | Net billing (export credit rate) | ~3¢ most hours; ~16¢ summer on-peak | 31% export-rate cut took effect Sept 2025 |
| Illinois | Supply-only netting ("NM 2.0") | ~50–60% of retail + smart-inverter rebate ≥$300/kW | Full-retail NM ended for systems energized after Jan 1, 2025 |
| Indiana | EDG rate | Wholesale × 1.25 (~3–4¢) | Net metering closed 2022; grandfathering to 2032 |
| Iowa | Full retail net metering | 1:1 retail; annual cash-out at avoided cost | May shift to value-of-solar tariffs at 2027 / 5% trigger |
| Kansas | Net metering (Evergy) | Retail netting; excess at system avg/avoided cost | Watch KCC dockets for DG charges |
| Kentucky | Netting with reduced export credit | Exports below retail (PSC-set rider) | Rates revisited in ongoing LG&E/KU cases |
| Louisiana | Net billing | Avoided cost (~2–4¢) for net exports | Pre-2020 customers grandfathered 15 yrs |
| Maine | Net energy billing | 1:1 retail kWh credits (expire after 12 mo) | 2025 reform spared residential rooftop |
| Maryland | Full retail net metering | 1:1 retail; credits now roll forward indefinitely | 2025 Flexibility Act ended forced April cash-out |
| Massachusetts | Full retail NM + SMART adder | 1:1 retail up to 10 kW, plus ~3¢ SMART incentive | SMART 3.0 launched; small systems cap-exempt |
| Michigan | Inflow/outflow net billing | ~75–80% of retail for outflow | 2023 law raised program cap 1% → 10% |
| Minnesota | Full retail net metering (<40 kW) | Average retail rate; annual cash-out option | Strongest in Midwest; co-op rules under debate |
| Mississippi | Net billing | Avoided cost + ~2.5¢ adder | Stable under PSC rule |
| Missouri | Net metering | Retail netting; excess at avoided cost, credits expire 12 mo | Stable |
| Montana | Full retail net metering | 1:1 retail; unused credits forfeited annually | PSC has rejected utility attempts to end NM |
| Nebraska | Net metering (≤25 kW) | Retail netting; excess at avoided cost | Public-power state; district-by-district tariffs |
| Nevada | Net metering (Tier 4) | 75% of retail, locked 20 years | Open tier, no capacity limit |
| New Hampshire | NEM 2.0 tariff | ~75–95% of retail (varies by utility) | Rate structure locked for enrollees long-term |
| New Jersey | Full retail net metering + SREC-II | 1:1 retail; annual excess at avoided cost | One of the strongest programs in the country |
| New Mexico | Net metering (Rule 570) | Retail netting; surplus at avoided cost | Stable |
| New York | Phase One NEM + CBC charge | 1:1 retail minus a small monthly per-kW charge | Stable; 20-yr term; NY-Sun rebates continue |
| North Carolina | Solar Choice / Bridge Rate (Duke) | Below retail (TOU netting or reduced bridge credit) | Legacy 1:1 customers move to Bridge Rate Jan 1, 2027 |
| North Dakota | Avoided-cost netting | Net excess at avoided cost (~2–3¢) | Weak compensation; co-ops not covered |
| Ohio | Generation-rate credit | Roughly 30–40% of full retail for excess | AEP push to cut further is pending at PUCO |
| Oklahoma | Netting, no payout required | Offsets usage; surplus generally forfeited | Stable |
| Oregon | Full retail net metering | 1:1 retail; annual excess to bill-assistance fund | OPUC reviewing compensation; no change adopted |
| Pennsylvania | Full retail NM — eroding | 1:1 at price-to-compare today; PPL moving new systems to hourly-based credit (~12% lower) | PPL settlement approved June 2026; FirstEnergy filing similar |
| Rhode Island | Net metering (~80% retail) or REG feed-in tariff | ~80% of retail, or fixed ~27¢ REG rate 15–20 yrs | Stable |
| South Carolina | Solar Choice net billing | Below retail, TOU-based with minimum bills | Successor terms active in Duke/Dominion cases |
| South Dakota | None mandated | PURPA avoided cost (~2–3¢) only | One of the weakest states for exports |
| Tennessee | None (TVA territory) | Sell-all at seasonal avoided cost (~2–4¢), or self-consume | No residential net metering pathway |
| Texas | No mandate — retail buyback plans | Varies by plan: 1:1 bill credit down to wholesale | Shop REP buyback plans; terms change often |
| Utah | Net billing (Schedule 137) | Export credit ~4–6¢, reset annually | Legacy 92.5% customers grandfathered |
| Vermont | Statutory NM with adjustors | Below retail (~22¢ area) and falling | 2026 rate review underway; adjustor cut 7 straight years |
| Virginia | Full retail net metering (NEM 2.0) | 1:1 retail; year-end excess ~5.8¢ | SCC rejected Dominion's cut (Apr 2026); pre-4/30/26 systems grandfathered |
| Washington | Full retail net metering | 1:1 retail; credits reset each Mar 31 | Guaranteed until utility caps or June 2029 |
| Washington DC | Full retail NM + SRECs | 1:1 retail; credits never expire; SRECs ~$300–400 | Strongest total compensation in the region |
| West Virginia | Netting, reduced credit | ~9¢/kWh for new customers (below retail) | Pre-2025 systems grandfathered at retail 25 yrs |
| Wisconsin | Utility-by-utility net metering | Retail netting for most IOUs; buyback rates vary | PSC preserving NM case-by-case |
| Wyoming | Full retail net metering (≤25 kW) | 1:1 retail; excess at avoided cost | 2025–26 rollback bills all failed |
What This Means for Your Solar Decision
If you're in a full-retail state (Florida, New Jersey, Maryland, Colorado, Virginia, Oregon, Washington, DC, Wyoming, Montana, Minnesota, Iowa, Delaware, Maine and others): solar math still works much the way it did before the federal credit ended — every panel-hour offsets your bill at full value. These are the states where going solar in 2026 remains most clearly worth it.
If you're in a net-billing state (California, Arizona, Idaho, Illinois, Michigan, North Carolina, Utah, Arkansas and others): exports earn far less than retail, so the game is self-consumption. Pairing panels with a battery — charging it midday, using it at night — recovers most of the lost value. This is why battery attachment rates in California have soared under NEM 3.0. See Is a Solar Battery Worth It in 2026?
If you're in a low or no-compensation state (South Dakota, Tennessee, Alabama, Oklahoma, North Dakota): solar can still make sense for offsetting your own daytime usage, but size the system to what you actually consume — oversizing just donates power to the utility.
If your state has a deadline (North Carolina's January 2027 bridge-rate cutoff, Pennsylvania's utility filings, Iowa's 2027 trigger, Washington's 2029 sunset): interconnecting sooner generally locks in today's better rate for a decade or more. Grandfathering has protected early customers in nearly every state that changed its rules.
Related guides: How Much Does Solar Cost in 2026? · Solar Incentives 2026 · Solar Tax Credit 2026 · Is Solar Worth It in 2026? · Solar by State
Frequently Asked Questions
What is net metering?
Net metering is a billing arrangement where your utility credits you for excess solar electricity your panels send to the grid. Under full retail net metering, one exported kWh cancels out one imported kWh on your bill.
Which states still have full retail net metering in 2026?
Roughly 20 states, including Florida, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Colorado, Virginia, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin (most utilities), Montana, Wyoming, Oregon, Washington, and Washington DC.
Did net metering replace the federal solar tax credit?
No — they were always separate. The 30% federal residential tax credit (Section 25D) expired December 31, 2025 and is not available for cash or loan purchases in 2026. Net metering is a state/utility policy and is now the biggest driver of solar savings. A federal credit (48E) still flows through solar leases and PPAs where the company owns the system — see our Solar Tax Credit 2026 guide.
What's the difference between net metering and net billing?
Net metering credits exports at the retail rate (1:1). Net billing credits them at a lower, separately set export rate — often based on the utility's avoided cost. Net billing states favor batteries and self-consumption.
Will my rate change after I install solar?
In almost every state that has reduced compensation, existing customers were grandfathered at their original terms for 10–25 years. Installing before a rule change generally locks in the better deal.
Is solar still worth it in states without net metering?
Often yes, if you size the system to your own daytime usage or add a battery — you're offsetting retail-priced power you'd otherwise buy. See Is Solar Worth It in 2026?
See What Solar Would Actually Save You Under Your State's Rules
Your net metering policy, electric rate, and usage determine your real payback. Get a personalized estimate in under a minute.
Sources: state public utility commissions (CPUC, PUCN, PUCO, Michigan PSC, MN PUC, and others), DSIRE, utility tariffs (FPL, Georgia Power, Duke Energy, Idaho Power, Rocky Mountain Power, Hawaiian Electric), and 2026 regulatory rulings including the Virginia SCC order (April 2026), the California appeals court NEM 3.0 decision (March 2026), and the Pennsylvania PPL settlement (June 2026). Last updated July 2026.